Company agreements can be tailored to the needs of certain companies. An agreement must improve the overall situation of an employee in relation to the corresponding price or prices. Under the Workplace Relations Act 1996, employers and workers can choose to prefer an AWA, certified agreement or award. It is also possible to have a combination of them in the same workplace. Other amendments made by the Echr Act have made illegal forms of unionisation (WR Act Part XA), such as for example. B the store closed before entry, although this agreement has never been sanctioned under federal labor law. In addition, preference clauses for public procurement have been removed under the WR Act s.94 and collective agreements must not contain “discriminatory” provisions (WR Act s.170 LU). In June 2000, the CUTA Congress approved the policy of including bargaining costs in agreements negotiated by trade unions, which stipulate that a bargaining fee will be deducted from the wages of all workers who will be covered and transferred to the union concerned, and that remuneration will be deducted from union dues when paid by the worker (DEWR proposal). The issue of bargaining fees was made public in the November 2001 federal election.

Until then, more than 200 collective operating agreements negotiated by the Electrical Trades Union (ETU) that contained provisions for the collection of such royalties had been challenged by the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC). This is explained by the fact that they have effectively forced non-trade unionists to join the corresponding union, but the challenge has no (so far) value. The media reported on the $500 (per year) negotiation fee included in these agreements, which should apparently be levied on non-unionized employees, while the agreements required 1 percent of an employee`s gross annual income or US$500 per year, “whichever is more important.” Nevertheless, the $500 fee has consolidated in public opinion. “The main objective of this Act is to create a framework for cooperative workplace relationships that promotes the economic prosperity and well-being of the Australian people in:. In order to give a more realistic estimate of the dispersion potential of these fees, the DEWR estimated that about 361 (or about 5.4 percent) of the federal agreements certified in 2001 contained bargaining costs and that the “average” agreement includes about 110 workers, allowing about 30,000 workers and probably less bargaining fees charged by the unions. In any event, it is unlikely that such fees will cover only half of the staff. The role of employers (and their associations) is also essential for the debate on bargaining costs. As already noted, collective agreements negotiated by unions may have included a provision in recent years, with workers being paid for the performance of bargaining. The employer in question, as part of the document, accepted the provision because of its inclusion. The employer does not realize the fee, since it is addressed to workers. .

. .